Smallbatch Chickenbatch Sliders vs. Smack Purrfect Pork

If you have ferrets, please check out Ferret Love
Create an account to hide ads!
You can't go wrong with either of these foods. They both received top marks.
Smallbatch has a better protein to fat ratio. Smack's ratio of 1.33 to 1 is too low (too fatty). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Smallbatch has slightly fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing. Both foods are mostly free of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
Smallbatch Chickenbatch Sliders
Smallbatch has a better protein to fat ratio. Smack's ratio of 1.33 to 1 is too low (too fatty). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
Smallbatch has slightly fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing.
First 10 ingredients:
chicken skinless chicken backs chicken hearts chicken gizzards chicken livers salmon oil organic dandelion greens organic apple cider vinegar organic kelp organic bee pollen
Smack Purrfect Pork
First 10 ingredients:
pork pork bone pork liver pork kidneys pork spleen pork tongue pork heart organic pumpkin organic celery organic apple
Smallbatch Chickenbatch SlidersFrozen Raw |
Smack Purrfect PorkFreeze-Dried Raw |
|
Score
A+ |
Score
A+ |
|
Food Type | Frozen Raw | Freeze-Dried Raw |
Meat % | 97% | 88% |
Protein % | 16% | 40% |
Fat % | 10.8% | 30% |
Fiber % | 0.2% | 1.8% |
Protein to Fat Ratio | 1.48 to 1 | 1.33 to 1 |
Total Ingredients | 12 | 14 |
Meat Content |
5 total
high concentration, high quality |
6 total
high concentration, high quality |
Non-Meats |
4 total
low concentration |
6 total
low concentration |
Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | Yes |
We only link to quality products. |