Orijen Tundra vs. Taste of the Wild Turkey Limited Ingredient Recipe
If you have ferrets, please check out Ferret Love
Create an account to hide ads!
If you purchase a product or service linked from this page, we may receive a commission. We will never link to or promote unhealthy or dangerous products. 100% of profits will be donated to animal charities. Read our mission statement
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. However, Taste of the Wild's ratio is not bad. (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Taste of the Wild has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing. Orijen has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
Orijen Tundra
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. However, Taste of the Wild's ratio is not bad. (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
Orijen has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
First 10 ingredients:
deboned goat deboned wild boar whole arctic char deboned venison steelhead trout deboned duck duck liver mutton whole pilchard mutton liver
Taste of the Wild Turkey Limited Ingredient Recipe
Taste of the Wild has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing.
First 10 ingredients:
turkey lentils sunflower oil natural flavor salmon oil dl-methionine dicalcium phosphate calcium carbonate salt choline chloride
Orijen TundraKibble |
Taste of the Wild Turkey Limited Ingredient RecipeKibble |
|
|
Score
B |
Score
D |
|
| Food Type | Kibble | Kibble |
| Meat % | Unknown | Unknown |
| Protein % | 40% | 33% |
| Fat % | 20% | 15% |
| Fiber % | 3% | 3% |
| Protein to Fat Ratio | 2 to 1 | 2.2 to 1 |
| Total Ingredients | 50 | 9 |
| Meat Content |
30 total
high concentration, high quality |
2 total
low concentration, high quality |
| Non-Meats |
14 total
low concentration |
1 total
low concentration |
| Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
| Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | Yes |
|
We only link to quality products. |
We only link to quality products. |
