Orijen Tundra vs. Taste of the Wild Canyon River Feline Recipe
If you have ferrets, please check out Ferret Love
Create an account to hide ads!
If you purchase a product or service linked from this page, we may receive a commission. We will never link to or promote unhealthy or dangerous products. 100% of profits will be donated to animal charities. Read our mission statement
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. Taste of the Wild's ratio of 2.67 to 1 is too high (not fatty enough). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Taste of the Wild has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing. Both foods are mostly free of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
Orijen Tundra
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. Taste of the Wild's ratio of 2.67 to 1 is too high (not fatty enough). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
First 10 ingredients:
deboned goat deboned wild boar whole arctic char deboned venison steelhead trout deboned duck duck liver mutton whole pilchard mutton liver
Taste of the Wild Canyon River Feline Recipe
Taste of the Wild has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing.
First 10 ingredients:
trout fish broth vegetable broth ocean fish salmon dried egg whites potato starch dried ground peas carrots sweet potatoes
Orijen TundraKibble |
Taste of the Wild Canyon River Feline RecipeCanned |
|
|
Score
B |
Score
C |
|
| Food Type | Kibble | Canned |
| Meat % | Unknown | Unknown |
| Protein % | 40% | 8% |
| Fat % | 20% | 3% |
| Fiber % | 3% | 1.5% |
| Protein to Fat Ratio | 2 to 1 | 2.67 to 1 |
| Total Ingredients | 50 | 25 |
| Meat Content |
30 total
high concentration, high quality |
6 total
high quality |
| Non-Meats |
14 total
low concentration |
8 total
low concentration |
| Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
| Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | Yes |
|
We only link to quality products. |
