Orijen Tundra vs. Smallbatch Duckbatch Sliders
If you have ferrets, please check out Ferret Love
Create an account to hide ads!
If you purchase a product or service linked from this page, we may receive a commission. We will never link to or promote unhealthy or dangerous products. 100% of profits will be donated to animal charities. Read our mission statement
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. Smallbatch's ratio of 1.42 to 1 is too low (too fatty). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Smallbatch has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing. Orijen has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
Orijen Tundra
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. Smallbatch's ratio of 1.42 to 1 is too low (too fatty). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
Orijen has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
First 10 ingredients:
deboned goat deboned wild boar whole arctic char deboned venison steelhead trout deboned duck duck liver mutton whole pilchard mutton liver
Smallbatch Duckbatch Sliders
Smallbatch has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing.
First 10 ingredients:
whole ducks including bones duck livers duck hearts duck gizzards salmon oil organic dandelion greens organic apple cider vinegar organic kelp organic bee pollen organic barley grass
Orijen TundraKibble |
Smallbatch Duckbatch SlidersFrozen Raw |
|
|
Score
B |
Score
A+ |
|
| Food Type | Kibble | Frozen Raw |
| Meat % | Unknown | 97% |
| Protein % | 40% | 15.1% |
| Fat % | 20% | 10.6% |
| Fiber % | 3% | 0.2% |
| Protein to Fat Ratio | 2 to 1 | 1.42 to 1 |
| Total Ingredients | 50 | 11 |
| Meat Content |
30 total
high concentration, high quality |
4 total
high concentration, high quality |
| Non-Meats |
14 total
low concentration |
4 total
low concentration |
| Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
| Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | Yes |
|
We only link to quality products. |
