Orijen Tundra vs. Smallbatch Chickenbatch Sliders
If you have ferrets, please check out Ferret Love
Create an account to hide ads!
If you purchase a product or service linked from this page, we may receive a commission. We will never link to or promote unhealthy or dangerous products. 100% of profits will be donated to animal charities. Read our mission statement
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. Smallbatch's ratio of 1.48 to 1 is too low (too fatty). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Smallbatch has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing. Both foods are mostly free of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
Orijen Tundra
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. Smallbatch's ratio of 1.48 to 1 is too low (too fatty). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
First 10 ingredients:
deboned goat deboned wild boar whole arctic char deboned venison steelhead trout deboned duck duck liver mutton whole pilchard mutton liver
Smallbatch Chickenbatch Sliders
Smallbatch has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing.
First 10 ingredients:
chicken skinless chicken backs chicken hearts chicken gizzards chicken livers salmon oil organic dandelion greens organic apple cider vinegar organic kelp organic bee pollen
Orijen TundraKibble |
Smallbatch Chickenbatch SlidersFrozen Raw |
|
|
Score
B |
Score
A+ |
|
| Food Type | Kibble | Frozen Raw |
| Meat % | Unknown | 97% |
| Protein % | 40% | 16% |
| Fat % | 20% | 10.8% |
| Fiber % | 3% | 0.2% |
| Protein to Fat Ratio | 2 to 1 | 1.48 to 1 |
| Total Ingredients | 50 | 12 |
| Meat Content |
30 total
high concentration, high quality |
5 total
high concentration, high quality |
| Non-Meats |
14 total
low concentration |
4 total
low concentration |
| Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
| Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | Yes |
|
We only link to quality products. |
