Orijen Tundra vs. Real Meat Chicken Recipe
If you have ferrets, please check out Ferret Love
Create an account to hide ads!
If you purchase a product or service linked from this page, we may receive a commission. We will never link to or promote unhealthy or dangerous products. 100% of profits will be donated to animal charities. Read our mission statement
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. Real Meat's ratio of 1.2 to 1 is too low (too fatty). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Real Meat has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing. Both foods are mostly free of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches. Real Meat contains controversial ingredients.
Orijen Tundra
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. Real Meat's ratio of 1.2 to 1 is too low (too fatty). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
Real Meat contains controversial ingredients.
First 10 ingredients:
deboned goat deboned wild boar whole arctic char deboned venison steelhead trout deboned duck duck liver mutton whole pilchard mutton liver
Real Meat Chicken Recipe
Real Meat has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing.
First 10 ingredients:
chicken chicken liver chicken heart chicken gizzard chicken neck vegetable glycerin pumpkin powder parsley powder inulin ground chicken bone
Orijen TundraKibble |
Real Meat Chicken RecipeAir-Dried Raw |
|
|
Score
B |
Score
A+ |
|
| Food Type | Kibble | Air-Dried Raw |
| Meat % | Unknown | 90% |
| Protein % | 40% | 30% |
| Fat % | 20% | 25% |
| Fiber % | 3% | 2% |
| Protein to Fat Ratio | 2 to 1 | 1.2 to 1 |
| Total Ingredients | 50 | 15 |
| Meat Content |
30 total
high concentration, high quality |
6 total
high concentration, high quality |
| Non-Meats |
14 total
low concentration |
3 total
low concentration |
| Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
| Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | No |
|
We only link to quality products. |
