Orijen Tundra vs. Rawz Meal Free Dehydrated Salmon and Chicken
If you have ferrets, please check out Ferret Love
Create an account to hide ads!
If you purchase a product or service linked from this page, we may receive a commission. We will never link to or promote unhealthy or dangerous products. 100% of profits will be donated to animal charities. Read our mission statement
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. Rawz's ratio of 3.33 to 1 is too high (not fatty enough). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Rawz has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing. Both foods are mostly free of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
Orijen Tundra
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. Rawz's ratio of 3.33 to 1 is too high (not fatty enough). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
First 10 ingredients:
deboned goat deboned wild boar whole arctic char deboned venison steelhead trout deboned duck duck liver mutton whole pilchard mutton liver
Rawz Meal Free Dehydrated Salmon and Chicken
Rawz has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing.
First 10 ingredients:
salmon dehydrated deboned chicken dehydrated chicken whitefish turkey turkey liver pea starch dried peas tapioca starch dried egg product
Orijen TundraKibble |
Rawz Meal Free Dehydrated Salmon and ChickenKibble |
|
|
Score
B |
Score
B |
|
| Food Type | Kibble | Kibble |
| Meat % | Unknown | Unknown |
| Protein % | 40% | 40% |
| Fat % | 20% | 12% |
| Fiber % | 3% | 4% |
| Protein to Fat Ratio | 2 to 1 | 3.33 to 1 |
| Total Ingredients | 50 | 23 |
| Meat Content |
30 total
high concentration, high quality |
8 total
high concentration, high quality |
| Non-Meats |
14 total
low concentration |
5 total
low concentration |
| Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
| Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | Yes |
|
We only link to quality products. |
