Orijen Tundra vs. Rawz Chicken & Chicken Liver Pate
If you have ferrets, please check out Ferret Love
Create an account to hide ads!
If you purchase a product or service linked from this page, we may receive a commission. We will never link to or promote unhealthy or dangerous products. 100% of profits will be donated to animal charities. Read our mission statement
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. Rawz's ratio of 1.22 to 1 is too low (too fatty). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Rawz has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing. Both foods are mostly free of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
Orijen Tundra
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. Rawz's ratio of 1.22 to 1 is too low (too fatty). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
First 10 ingredients:
deboned goat deboned wild boar whole arctic char deboned venison steelhead trout deboned duck duck liver mutton whole pilchard mutton liver
Rawz Chicken & Chicken Liver Pate
Rawz has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing.
First 10 ingredients:
chicken chicken liver chicken broth fenugreek seeds natural flavor potassium chloride choline chloride calcium carbonate salt vegetable broth
Orijen TundraKibble |
Rawz Chicken & Chicken Liver PateCanned |
|
|
Score
B |
Score
A+ |
|
| Food Type | Kibble | Canned |
| Meat % | Unknown | 96% |
| Protein % | 40% | 11% |
| Fat % | 20% | 9% |
| Fiber % | 3% | 1% |
| Protein to Fat Ratio | 2 to 1 | 1.22 to 1 |
| Total Ingredients | 50 | 8 |
| Meat Content |
30 total
high concentration, high quality |
4 total
high concentration, high quality |
| Non-Meats |
14 total
low concentration |
1 total
low concentration |
| Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
| Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | Yes |
|
We only link to quality products. |
