Orijen Tundra vs. Raw Paws Complete Chicken Pet Food
If you have ferrets, please check out Ferret Love
Create an account to hide ads!
If you purchase a product or service linked from this page, we may receive a commission. We will never link to or promote unhealthy or dangerous products. 100% of profits will be donated to animal charities. Read our mission statement
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. However, Raw Paws's ratio is not bad. (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Raw Paws has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing. Both foods are 100% free of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
Orijen Tundra
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. However, Raw Paws's ratio is not bad. (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
First 10 ingredients:
deboned goat deboned wild boar whole arctic char deboned venison steelhead trout deboned duck duck liver mutton whole pilchard mutton liver
Raw Paws Complete Chicken Pet Food
Raw Paws has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing.
First 10 ingredients:
ground chicken with bone chicken heart chicken liver herring oil mixed tocopherols d-alpha tocopherol
Orijen TundraKibble |
Raw Paws Complete Chicken Pet FoodFreeze-Dried Raw |
|
|
Score
B |
Score
A+ |
|
| Food Type | Kibble | Freeze-Dried Raw |
| Meat % | Unknown | 100% |
| Protein % | 40% | 45% |
| Fat % | 20% | 27% |
| Fiber % | 3% | 2.2% |
| Protein to Fat Ratio | 2 to 1 | 1.67 to 1 |
| Total Ingredients | 50 | 5 |
| Meat Content |
30 total
high concentration, high quality |
3 total
high concentration, high quality |
| Non-Meats |
14 total
low concentration |
None |
| Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
| Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | Yes |
|
We only link to quality products. |
