Orijen Tundra vs. Purina Pro Plan Shredded Blend Chicken & Rice Formula
If you have ferrets, please check out Ferret Love
Create an account to hide ads!
If you purchase a product or service linked from this page, we may receive a commission. We will never link to or promote unhealthy or dangerous products. 100% of profits will be donated to animal charities. Read our mission statement
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. Purina's ratio of 2.21 to 1 is too high (not fatty enough). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Purina has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing. Orijen has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches. Purina contains controversial ingredients.
Orijen Tundra
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. Purina's ratio of 2.21 to 1 is too high (not fatty enough). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
Orijen has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
Purina contains controversial ingredients.
First 10 ingredients:
deboned goat deboned wild boar whole arctic char deboned venison steelhead trout deboned duck duck liver mutton whole pilchard mutton liver
Purina Pro Plan Shredded Blend Chicken & Rice Formula
Purina has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing.
First 10 ingredients:
chicken corn gluten meal rice beef fat soybean meal chicken by-product meal poultry by-product meal soy protein isolate dried egg product cassava root flour
Orijen TundraKibble |
Purina Pro Plan Shredded Blend Chicken & Rice FormulaKibble |
|
Score
B |
Score
C |
|
Food Type | Kibble | Kibble |
Meat % | Unknown | Unknown |
Protein % | 40% | 42% |
Fat % | 20% | 19% |
Fiber % | 3% | 2.5% |
Protein to Fat Ratio | 2 to 1 | 2.21 to 1 |
Total Ingredients | 50 | 30 |
Meat Content |
30 total
high concentration, high quality |
7 total
low concentration, high quality |
Non-Meats |
14 total
low concentration |
6 total
low concentration |
Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | No |
We only link to quality products. |