Orijen Tundra vs. Purina Kitten Chow Naturals
If you have ferrets, please check out Ferret Love
Create an account to hide ads!
If you purchase a product or service linked from this page, we may receive a commission. We will never link to or promote unhealthy or dangerous products. 100% of profits will be donated to animal charities. Read our mission statement
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. Purina's ratio of 2.67 to 1 is too high (not fatty enough). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Purina has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing. Orijen has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
Orijen Tundra
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. Purina's ratio of 2.67 to 1 is too high (not fatty enough). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
Orijen has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
First 10 ingredients:
deboned goat deboned wild boar whole arctic char deboned venison steelhead trout deboned duck duck liver mutton whole pilchard mutton liver
Purina Kitten Chow Naturals
Purina has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing.
First 10 ingredients:
chicken chicken by-product meal corn gluten meal soy flour ground yellow corn beef fat rice ground whole wheat natural liver flavor phosphoric acid
Orijen TundraKibble |
Purina Kitten Chow NaturalsKibble |
|
|
Score
B |
Score
C |
|
| Food Type | Kibble | Kibble |
| Meat % | Unknown | Unknown |
| Protein % | 40% | 40% |
| Fat % | 20% | 15% |
| Fiber % | 3% | 2.5% |
| Protein to Fat Ratio | 2 to 1 | 2.67 to 1 |
| Total Ingredients | 50 | 20 |
| Meat Content |
30 total
high concentration, high quality |
4 total
high quality |
| Non-Meats |
14 total
low concentration |
5 total
low concentration |
| Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
| Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | Yes |
|
We only link to quality products. |
