Orijen Tundra vs. Nature's Variety Instinct Raw Frozen Bites Chicken
If you have ferrets, please check out Ferret Love
Create an account to hide ads!
If you purchase a product or service linked from this page, we may receive a commission. We will never link to or promote unhealthy or dangerous products. 100% of profits will be donated to animal charities. Read our mission statement
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. Nature's Variety's ratio of 1.33 to 1 is too low (too fatty). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Nature's Variety has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing. Orijen has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
Orijen Tundra
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. Nature's Variety's ratio of 1.33 to 1 is too low (too fatty). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
Orijen has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
First 10 ingredients:
deboned goat deboned wild boar whole arctic char deboned venison steelhead trout deboned duck duck liver mutton whole pilchard mutton liver
Nature's Variety Instinct Raw Frozen Bites Chicken
Nature's Variety has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing.
First 10 ingredients:
chicken chicken liver chicken heart montmorillonite clay ground flaxseed salmon oil carrots apples butternut squash vitamins
Orijen TundraKibble |
Nature's Variety Instinct Raw Frozen Bites ChickenFrozen Raw |
|
|
Score
B |
Score
A+ |
|
| Food Type | Kibble | Frozen Raw |
| Meat % | Unknown | 93% |
| Protein % | 40% | 12% |
| Fat % | 20% | 9% |
| Fiber % | 3% | 3% |
| Protein to Fat Ratio | 2 to 1 | 1.33 to 1 |
| Total Ingredients | 50 | 12 |
| Meat Content |
30 total
high concentration, high quality |
3 total
high concentration, high quality |
| Non-Meats |
14 total
low concentration |
6 total
low concentration |
| Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
| Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | Yes |
|
We only link to quality products. |
