Orijen Tundra vs. IAMS Proactive Health High Protein
If you have ferrets, please check out Ferret Love
Create an account to hide ads!
If you purchase a product or service linked from this page, we may receive a commission. We will never link to or promote unhealthy or dangerous products. 100% of profits will be donated to animal charities. Read our mission statement
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. However, IAMS's ratio is not bad. (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) IAMS has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing. Orijen has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
Orijen Tundra
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. However, IAMS's ratio is not bad. (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
Orijen has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
First 10 ingredients:
deboned goat deboned wild boar whole arctic char deboned venison steelhead trout deboned duck duck liver mutton whole pilchard mutton liver
IAMS Proactive Health High Protein
IAMS has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing.
First 10 ingredients:
chicken chicken byproduct meal corn grits ground whole grain corn salmon chicken meal dried plain beet pulp natural flavor sodium bisulfate caramel color
Orijen TundraKibble |
IAMS Proactive Health High ProteinKibble |
|
|
Score
B |
Score
C |
|
| Food Type | Kibble | Kibble |
| Meat % | Unknown | Unknown |
| Protein % | 40% | 38% |
| Fat % | 20% | 18% |
| Fiber % | 3% | 3% |
| Protein to Fat Ratio | 2 to 1 | 2.11 to 1 |
| Total Ingredients | 50 | 16 |
| Meat Content |
30 total
high concentration, high quality |
6 total
high quality |
| Non-Meats |
14 total
low concentration |
3 total
low concentration |
| Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
| Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | Yes |
|
We only link to quality products. |
