Orijen Tundra vs. Catit Recipes Oak Valley
If you have ferrets, please check out Ferret Love
Create an account to hide ads!
If you purchase a product or service linked from this page, we may receive a commission. We will never link to or promote unhealthy or dangerous products. 100% of profits will be donated to animal charities. Read our mission statement
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. However, Catit's ratio is not bad. (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Catit has slightly fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing. Both foods are mostly free of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
Orijen Tundra
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. However, Catit's ratio is not bad. (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
First 10 ingredients:
deboned goat deboned wild boar whole arctic char deboned venison steelhead trout deboned duck duck liver mutton whole pilchard mutton liver
Catit Recipes Oak Valley
Catit has slightly fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing.
First 10 ingredients:
deboned pork deboned beef beef liver pork liver deboned lamb deboned wild boar pork meal pea protein peas pork fat
Orijen TundraKibble |
Catit Recipes Oak ValleyKibble |
|
|
Score
B |
Score
B |
|
| Food Type | Kibble | Kibble |
| Meat % | Unknown | Unknown |
| Protein % | 40% | 38% |
| Fat % | 20% | 18% |
| Fiber % | 3% | 3.5% |
| Protein to Fat Ratio | 2 to 1 | 2.11 to 1 |
| Total Ingredients | 50 | 47 |
| Meat Content |
30 total
high concentration, high quality |
12 total
high concentration, high quality |
| Non-Meats |
14 total
low concentration |
18 total
low concentration |
| Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
| Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | Yes |
|
We only link to quality products. |
