Orijen Tundra vs. Catit Nuna Insect Protein & Herring
If you have ferrets, please check out Ferret Love
Create an account to hide ads!
If you purchase a product or service linked from this page, we may receive a commission. We will never link to or promote unhealthy or dangerous products. 100% of profits will be donated to animal charities. Read our mission statement
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. Catit's ratio of 2.46 to 1 is too high (not fatty enough). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Catit has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing. Orijen has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
Orijen Tundra
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. Catit's ratio of 2.46 to 1 is too high (not fatty enough). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
Orijen has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
First 10 ingredients:
deboned goat deboned wild boar whole arctic char deboned venison steelhead trout deboned duck duck liver mutton whole pilchard mutton liver
Catit Nuna Insect Protein & Herring
Catit has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing.
First 10 ingredients:
black soldier fly larvae hydrolyzed yeast protein herring meal millet peas lentils sunflower oil natural chicken flavor hulled sunflower seeds flaxseeds
Orijen TundraKibble |
Catit Nuna Insect Protein & HerringKibble |
|
|
Score
B |
Score
F |
|
| Food Type | Kibble | Kibble |
| Meat % | Unknown | Unknown |
| Protein % | 40% | 32% |
| Fat % | 20% | 13% |
| Fiber % | 3% | 5% |
| Protein to Fat Ratio | 2 to 1 | 2.46 to 1 |
| Total Ingredients | 50 | 16 |
| Meat Content |
30 total
high concentration, high quality |
2 total
low concentration, low quality |
| Non-Meats |
14 total
low concentration |
4 total
low concentration |
| Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
| Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | Yes |
|
We only link to quality products. |
We only link to quality products. |
