Orijen Six Fish vs. Catit Nuna Insect Protein & Herring
If you have ferrets, please check out Ferret Love
Create an account to hide ads!
If you purchase a product or service linked from this page, we may receive a commission. We will never link to or promote unhealthy or dangerous products. 100% of profits will be donated to animal charities. Read our mission statement
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. Catit's ratio of 2.46 to 1 is too high (not fatty enough). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Catit has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing. Orijen has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
Orijen Six Fish
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. Catit's ratio of 2.46 to 1 is too high (not fatty enough). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
Orijen has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
First 10 ingredients:
whole atlantic mackerel whole atlantic herring flounder whole acadian redfish atlantic monkfish silver hake mackerel meal herring meal blue whiting meal alaskan pollock oil
Catit Nuna Insect Protein & Herring
Catit has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing.
First 10 ingredients:
black soldier fly larvae hydrolyzed yeast protein herring meal millet peas lentils sunflower oil natural chicken flavor hulled sunflower seeds flaxseeds
Orijen Six FishKibble |
Catit Nuna Insect Protein & HerringKibble |
|
Score
B |
Score
F |
|
Food Type | Kibble | Kibble |
Meat % | Unknown | Unknown |
Protein % | 40% | 32% |
Fat % | 20% | 13% |
Fiber % | 3% | 5% |
Protein to Fat Ratio | 2 to 1 | 2.46 to 1 |
Total Ingredients | 43 | 16 |
Meat Content |
12 total
high concentration, high quality |
2 total
low concentration, low quality |
Non-Meats |
24 total
low concentration |
4 total
low concentration |
Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | Yes |
We only link to quality products. |
We only link to quality products. |