Orijen Regional Red vs. Hill's Prescription Diet a/d Wet Dog/Cat Food
If you have ferrets, please check out Ferret Love
Create an account to hide ads!
If you purchase a product or service linked from this page, we may receive a commission. We will never link to or promote unhealthy or dangerous products. 100% of profits will be donated to animal charities. Read our mission statement
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. Hill's's ratio of 1.33 to 1 is too low (too fatty). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Hill's has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing. Orijen has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
Orijen Regional Red
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. Hill's's ratio of 1.33 to 1 is too low (too fatty). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
Orijen has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
First 10 ingredients:
deboned beef deboned wild boar deboned goat deboned lamb lamb liver beef liver beef tripe wild boar liver deboned mutton beef heart
Hill's Prescription Diet a/d Wet Dog/Cat Food
Hill's has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing.
First 10 ingredients:
water turkey liver pork liver chicken turkey heart corn flour pork protein isolate fish oil calcium carbonate chicken liver flavor
Orijen Regional RedKibble |
Hill's Prescription Diet a/d Wet Dog/Cat FoodCanned |
|
|
Score
F |
Score
A |
|
| Food Type | Kibble | Canned |
| Meat % | Unknown | Unknown |
| Protein % | 40% | 44% |
| Fat % | 20% | 33% |
| Fiber % | 3% | 0.1% |
| Protein to Fat Ratio | 2 to 1 | 1.33 to 1 |
| Total Ingredients | 59 | 18 |
| Meat Content |
31 total
high concentration, high quality |
7 total
high concentration, high quality |
| Non-Meats |
23 total
low concentration |
2 total
low concentration |
| Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
| Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | Yes |
|
We only link to quality products. |
Prescription needed
We only link to quality products. |
