Orijen Regional Red vs. Blue Wilderness Adult Duck
If you have ferrets, please check out Ferret Love
Create an account to hide ads!
If you purchase a product or service linked from this page, we may receive a commission. We will never link to or promote unhealthy or dangerous products. 100% of profits will be donated to animal charities. Read our mission statement
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. Blue Wilderness's ratio of 2.22 to 1 is too high (not fatty enough). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Blue Wilderness has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing. Orijen has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
Orijen Regional Red
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. Blue Wilderness's ratio of 2.22 to 1 is too high (not fatty enough). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
Orijen has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
First 10 ingredients:
deboned beef deboned wild boar deboned goat deboned lamb lamb liver beef liver beef tripe wild boar liver deboned mutton beef heart
Blue Wilderness Adult Duck
Blue Wilderness has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing.
First 10 ingredients:
deboned duck chicken meal pea protein peas tapioca starch menhaden fish meal chicken fat dried egg product flaxseed natural flavor
Orijen Regional RedKibble |
Blue Wilderness Adult DuckKibble |
|
|
Score
B |
Score
D |
|
| Food Type | Kibble | Kibble |
| Meat % | Unknown | Unknown |
| Protein % | 40% | 40% |
| Fat % | 20% | 18% |
| Fiber % | 3% | 4% |
| Protein to Fat Ratio | 2 to 1 | 2.22 to 1 |
| Total Ingredients | 59 | 38 |
| Meat Content |
31 total
high concentration, high quality |
6 total
high quality |
| Non-Meats |
23 total
low concentration |
13 total
low concentration |
| Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
| Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | Yes |
|
We only link to quality products. |
We only link to quality products. |
