Nutrience SubZero Fraser Valley Formula vs. Orijen Tundra
If you have ferrets, please check out Ferret Love
Create an account to hide ads!
If you purchase a product or service linked from this page, we may receive a commission. We will never link to or promote unhealthy or dangerous products. 100% of profits will be donated to animal charities. Read our mission statement
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. However, Nutrience's ratio is not bad. (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Orijen has fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing. Both foods are mostly free of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
Nutrience SubZero Fraser Valley Formula
First 10 ingredients:
deboned chicken deboned turkey chicken meal turkey meal salmon chicken liver chicken heart turkey liver turkey heart herring
Orijen Tundra
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. However, Nutrience's ratio is not bad. (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
Orijen has fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing.
First 10 ingredients:
deboned goat deboned wild boar whole arctic char deboned venison steelhead trout deboned duck duck liver mutton whole pilchard mutton liver
Nutrience SubZero Fraser Valley FormulaKibble |
Orijen TundraKibble |
|
|
Score
B |
Score
B |
|
| Food Type | Kibble | Kibble |
| Meat % | Unknown | Unknown |
| Protein % | 42% | 40% |
| Fat % | 20% | 20% |
| Fiber % | 3.5% | 3% |
| Protein to Fat Ratio | 2.1 to 1 | 2 to 1 |
| Total Ingredients | 57 | 50 |
| Meat Content |
19 total
high concentration, high quality |
30 total
high concentration, high quality |
| Non-Meats |
18 total
low concentration |
14 total
low concentration |
| Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
| Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | Yes |
|
We only link to quality products. |
