Rawz Chicken & Chicken Liver Pate vs. Smallbatch Chickenbatch Sliders
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90448/90448d0116fe6b9e60ea4fc8ab9579968c9313ad" alt="cat"
If you have ferrets, please check out Ferret Love
Create an account to hide ads!
You can't go wrong with either of these foods. They both received top marks.
Smallbatch has a better protein to fat ratio. Rawz's ratio of 1.22 to 1 is too low (too fatty). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Rawz has slightly fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing. Both foods are mostly free of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
Rawz Chicken & Chicken Liver Pate
Rawz has slightly fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing.
First 10 ingredients:
chicken chicken liver chicken broth fenugreek seeds natural flavor potassium chloride choline chloride calcium carbonate salt vegetable broth
Smallbatch Chickenbatch Sliders
Smallbatch has a better protein to fat ratio. Rawz's ratio of 1.22 to 1 is too low (too fatty). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
First 10 ingredients:
chicken skinless chicken backs chicken hearts chicken gizzards chicken livers salmon oil organic dandelion greens organic apple cider vinegar organic kelp organic bee pollen
Rawz Chicken & Chicken Liver PateCanned |
Smallbatch Chickenbatch SlidersFrozen Raw |
|
Score
A+ |
Score
A+ |
|
Food Type | Canned | Frozen Raw |
Meat % | 96% | 97% |
Protein % | 11% | 16% |
Fat % | 9% | 10.8% |
Fiber % | 1% | 0.2% |
Protein to Fat Ratio | 1.22 to 1 | 1.48 to 1 |
Total Ingredients | 8 | 12 |
Meat Content |
4 total
high concentration, high quality |
5 total
high concentration, high quality |
Non-Meats |
1 total
low concentration |
4 total
low concentration |
Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | Yes |