Orijen Tundra vs. Smallbatch Freezedried Chickenbites
If you have ferrets, please check out Ferret Love
Create an account to hide ads!
If you purchase a product or service linked from this page, we may receive a commission. We will never link to or promote unhealthy or dangerous products. 100% of profits will be donated to animal charities. Read our mission statement
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. However, Smallbatch's ratio is not bad. (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Smallbatch has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing. Both foods are mostly free of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
Orijen Tundra
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. However, Smallbatch's ratio is not bad. (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
First 10 ingredients:
deboned goat deboned wild boar whole arctic char deboned venison steelhead trout deboned duck duck liver mutton whole pilchard mutton liver
Smallbatch Freezedried Chickenbites
Smallbatch has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing.
First 10 ingredients:
chicken including bone chicken chicken gizzards chicken hearts chicken livers organic winter squash organic spinach organic mct oil salmon oil organic turmeric
Orijen TundraKibble |
Smallbatch Freezedried ChickenbitesFreeze-Dried Raw |
|
Score
B |
Score
A+ |
|
Food Type | Kibble | Freeze-Dried Raw |
Meat % | Unknown | 95% |
Protein % | 40% | 57.8% |
Fat % | 20% | 27.5% |
Fiber % | 3% | 1.9% |
Protein to Fat Ratio | 2 to 1 | 2.1 to 1 |
Total Ingredients | 50 | 13 |
Meat Content |
30 total
high concentration, high quality |
4 total
high concentration, high quality |
Non-Meats |
14 total
low concentration |
1 total
low concentration |
Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | Yes |
We only link to quality products. |