Orijen Regional Red vs. Smack Purrfect Pork
If you have ferrets, please check out Ferret Love
Create an account to hide ads!
If you purchase a product or service linked from this page, we may receive a commission. We will never link to or promote unhealthy or dangerous products. 100% of profits will be donated to animal charities. Read our mission statement
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. Smack's ratio of 1.33 to 1 is too low (too fatty). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Smack has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing. Both foods are mostly free of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
Orijen Regional Red
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. Smack's ratio of 1.33 to 1 is too low (too fatty). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
First 10 ingredients:
deboned beef deboned wild boar deboned goat deboned lamb lamb liver beef liver beef tripe wild boar liver deboned mutton beef heart
Smack Purrfect Pork
Smack has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing.
First 10 ingredients:
pork pork bone pork liver pork kidneys pork spleen pork tongue pork heart organic pumpkin organic celery organic apple
Orijen Regional RedKibble |
Smack Purrfect PorkFreeze-Dried Raw |
|
|
Score
B |
Score
A+ |
|
| Food Type | Kibble | Freeze-Dried Raw |
| Meat % | Unknown | 88% |
| Protein % | 40% | 40% |
| Fat % | 20% | 30% |
| Fiber % | 3% | 1.8% |
| Protein to Fat Ratio | 2 to 1 | 1.33 to 1 |
| Total Ingredients | 59 | 14 |
| Meat Content |
31 total
high concentration, high quality |
6 total
high concentration, high quality |
| Non-Meats |
23 total
low concentration |
6 total
low concentration |
| Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
| Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | Yes |
|
We only link to quality products. |
We only link to quality products. |
