Orijen Tundra vs. Natures Menu Country Hunter Duck and Pheasant
If you have ferrets, please check out Ferret Love
Create an account to hide ads!
If you purchase a product or service linked from this page, we may receive a commission. We will never link to or promote unhealthy or dangerous products. 100% of profits will be donated to animal charities. Read our mission statement
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. However, Natures Menu's ratio is not bad. (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Natures Menu has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing. Orijen has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
Orijen Tundra
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. However, Natures Menu's ratio is not bad. (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
Orijen has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
First 10 ingredients:
deboned goat deboned wild boar whole arctic char deboned venison steelhead trout deboned duck duck liver mutton whole pilchard mutton liver
Natures Menu Country Hunter Duck and Pheasant
Natures Menu has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing.
First 10 ingredients:
duck pheasant blueberry cranberry spirulina catnip yucca extract green tea extract grape seed extract rosemary extract
Orijen TundraKibble |
Natures Menu Country Hunter Duck and PheasantCanned |
|
|
Score
B |
Score
A |
|
| Food Type | Kibble | Canned |
| Meat % | Unknown | 96% |
| Protein % | 40% | 10.5% |
| Fat % | 20% | 6.3% |
| Fiber % | 3% | 0.3% |
| Protein to Fat Ratio | 2 to 1 | 1.67 to 1 |
| Total Ingredients | 50 | 12 |
| Meat Content |
30 total
high concentration, high quality |
2 total
high concentration, high quality |
| Non-Meats |
14 total
low concentration |
3 total
low concentration |
| Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
| Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | Yes |
|
We only link to quality products. |
