Orijen Regional Red vs. Hill's Prescription Diet t/d
If you have ferrets, please check out Ferret Love
Create an account to hide ads!
If you purchase a product or service linked from this page, we may receive a commission. We will never link to or promote unhealthy or dangerous products. 100% of profits will be donated to animal charities. Read our mission statement
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. However, Hill's's ratio is not bad. (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Hill's has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing. Orijen has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
Orijen Regional Red
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. However, Hill's's ratio is not bad. (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
Orijen has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
First 10 ingredients:
deboned beef deboned wild boar deboned goat deboned lamb lamb liver beef liver beef tripe wild boar liver deboned mutton beef heart
Hill's Prescription Diet t/d
Hill's has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing.
First 10 ingredients:
chicken by-product meal brewers rice corn gluten meal whole grain corn powdered cellulose chicken fat chicken liver flavor lactic acid calcium sulfate soybean oil
Orijen Regional RedKibble |
Hill's Prescription Diet t/dKibble |
|
|
Score
B |
Score
D |
|
| Food Type | Kibble | Kibble |
| Meat % | Unknown | Unknown |
| Protein % | 40% | 35% |
| Fat % | 20% | 17% |
| Fiber % | 3% | 8.3% |
| Protein to Fat Ratio | 2 to 1 | 2.06 to 1 |
| Total Ingredients | 59 | 18 |
| Meat Content |
31 total
high concentration, high quality |
4 total
low concentration, low quality |
| Non-Meats |
23 total
low concentration |
3 total
low concentration |
| Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
| Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | Yes |
|
We only link to quality products. |
Prescription needed
We only link to quality products. |
